Shape & Behavior Correlation

Shape & Behavior Correlations (2025-04-27 to 2026-03-24) — TicTac, Other

By Frankie (Observer)March 26, 2026781 sightings analyzedGenerated in 56.4s

Key Takeaways

  • Every single sighting in this dataset was classified as 'Other' shape, meaning no standard shapes like discs or triangles were reported during this period.
  • Most sightings (72.3%) occurred during evening and nighttime hours, suggesting a strong observational bias towards periods of low ambient light.
  • The vast majority of reports (92.4%) lacked any data on the object's movement, altitude, or the weather conditions at the time, severely limiting analysis.
  • Only 5.5% of reports were corroborated by multiple witnesses, which is significantly lower than the global average of 11.33% for similar data.

Abstract

This study analyzes a dataset of 781 Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) sightings from April 27, 2025, to March 24, 2026, focusing on morphological classification and behavioral correlations. The analysis reveals a dataset exclusively composed of 'Other' shape classifications, with significant gaps in key observational data fields including movement, altitude, and weather. Key findings include a strong diurnal pattern favoring evening and nighttime observations and a corroboration rate substantially below the global baseline. The study highlights the critical limitations imposed by incomplete data on taxonomic and behavioral analysis.

Sighting Locations

Context

How This Study Compares

Corroboration Rate
This study
5.5%
Global avg
11.33%
Avg Witnesses / Report
This study
1.1
Global avg
1.5
Reports / Day
This study
2.4
Global avg
2.9
Other Concentration
This study
100%
Global avg
28% globally

Compared against 126,928 sightings in the global database.

Data Overview

Sample Size

781

Corroborated

43

Total Witnesses

834

Avg Witnesses

1.1

Sighting Frequency Over Time

14386185108Apr '25Jun '25Aug '25Oct '25Dec '25Feb '26Mar '26

Time of Day

Dusk (5pm-10pm)328 (42.0%)Night (10pm-5am)237 (30.3%)Day (9am-5pm)148 (19.0%)Dawn (5am-9am)68 (8.7%)

Sighting Duration

Unknown722 (92.4%)1-5 min19 (2.4%)60+ min18 (2.3%)5-15 min11 (1.4%)15-60 min11 (1.4%)

Methodology

The analysis is based on an aggregated dataset of 781 UAP sighting reports spanning an 11-month period from April 27, 2025, to March 24, 2026. The dataset's geographic scope is global, with a concentration of reports from North America, as indicated by the top locations list (e.g., California: 63, Texas: 48). The primary analytical method involved descriptive statistical analysis of provided data dimensions. The study specifically examined the shapeBreakdown, movementPatterns, altitudeBreakdown, weatherBreakdown, and hourOfDayBreakdown to identify correlations between morphology and behavior, and to assess observational context. The dataset was contextualized against a provided global baseline (N=126,928) for comparative analysis of metrics such as corroboration rate and average witnesses. All 781 records were classified under a single morphological category ('Other'), precluding any intra-dataset shape-based correlation analysis. Therefore, the investigation focused on characterizing the dataset's properties, identifying data completeness issues, and comparing its aggregate statistics to the broader phenomenological baseline. Temporal analysis utilized the monthlyTrend data, and spatial distribution was reviewed via the locationPoints list.

Data Analysis

Quantitative analysis of the 781-sighting dataset reveals a homogeneous morphological profile: the shapeBreakdown shows 100% (n=781) of sightings classified as 'Other'. This stands in stark contrast to the globalShapeDistribution, where 'Other' constitutes approximately 28.0% of reports. Key behavioral and contextual data fields are predominantly null: movementPatterns and altitudeBreakdown are empty objects, and weatherBreakdown is 100% 'Unknown' (n=781). Duration data is largely absent, with 92.4% (n=722) Unknown; of the 59 events with duration, 30.5% (n=18) lasted 60+ minutes and 32.2% (n=19) lasted 1-5 minutes. Temporal analysis shows a clear diurnal pattern: 42.0% (n=328) of sightings occurred at Dusk (5pm-10pm) and 30.3% (n=237) at Night (10pm-5am), collectively accounting for 72.3% of reports. Daytime (9am-5pm) sightings comprised 18.9% (n=148), and Dawn (5am-9am) 8.7% (n=68). Monthly frequency peaked in November 2025 (n=108) and October 2025 (n=102). The corroboration rate is 5.5% (43 of 781 events), with an average of 1.1 witnesses per event. Geographically, reports are concentrated in the United States and Canada, with California (n=63), Texas (n=48), and Florida (n=46) being the top three sub-national regions.

Findings

The exclusive classification of all sightings as 'Other' shape is the most statistically significant finding. This represents a severe deviation from the expected distribution observed in the global baseline, where 'Orb', 'Disc', and 'Triangle' are prevalent. This anomaly suggests either a unique phenomenological cluster within the specified spatiotemporal window, a fundamental shift in reporting taxonomy, or, most likely, a systematic data collection or processing artifact that has collapsed all shape descriptors into a single catch-all category. The strong skew towards dusk and nighttime observations (72.3%) is consistent with known observational biases in UAP reporting, where objects are more easily visible against a dark sky. The near-total absence of data on movement (0%), altitude (0%), and weather (100% Unknown) is a critical limitation. It precludes any meaningful analysis of shape-behavior or shape-altitude correlations, which was the study's primary objective. The low corroboration rate (5.5% vs. 11.33% global baseline) and low average witness count (1.1 vs. 1.5) further indicate that this dataset is composed predominantly of single-witness, anecdotal reports with minimal independent verification. The geographic distribution shows expected population-density correlations, with no unusual clustering beyond major metropolitan areas. The duration data, where available, suggests a bimodal distribution between very short (1-5 min) and very long (60+ min) events, but the sample size (n=59) is too small for definitive conclusions.

Conclusions

The overall assessment of this dataset is that it is unsuitable for conducting a meaningful analysis of UAP shape and behavior correlations due to catastrophic data incompleteness in the core variables of interest (shape, movement, altitude). The finding of 100% 'Other' shape classification is not interpretable as a phenomenological result but rather as a major data quality issue. Confidence in any morphological or behavioral findings is therefore rated **Low**. The primary limitation is the lack of granular, structured data for the key analytical dimensions. The dataset appears to be an aggregation where specific descriptors have been lost or were never recorded. The diurnal pattern and geographic distribution provide useful meta-level context about reporting conditions and demographics, but do not advance taxonomic understanding. Recommendations for further research are: 1) Investigate the provenance and collection methodology of this dataset to understand the cause of the uniform 'Other' classification. 2) Prioritize the collection and analysis of datasets with high-fidelity, witness-verified shape descriptors and correlated kinematic data. 3) Future studies should employ stricter data quality filters to exclude reports lacking fundamental observational parameters before attempting correlation analysis.

References

UAP Tracker Sighting Database, Aggregated Dataset (2025-04-27 to 2026-03-24), N=781 records. Global UAP Phenomenology Baseline Dataset, N=126,928 records, referenced for comparative shape distribution and corroboration rates. U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence. (2021). Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena. (Provides context for standardized UAP reporting and analysis frameworks). National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC) Data Feed. (Cited as primary source for 639 of 781 records in sourceBreakdown). Coulthart, T. (2023). In Plain Sight: An investigation into UFOs and impossible science. (Discusses witness reporting biases and data aggregation challenges). Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies (SCU). (2022). Guidelines for UAP Data Collection and Analysis. (Methodological reference for structured analysis).
Share
FollowXYouTubeReddit